On 10/30/2023 8:05 AM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Yes well of course no issue arises if I just change the whole font.
But I wanted to keep using the mono font thus reporting issues with it.
In that case you have to go for flushleft
\setupalign[verytolerant,nothyphenated,flushleft]
because otherwise tex
On 10/29/2023 1:33 PM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
how about just using this
\setupbodyfont[concrete]
\starttext
When $a, b,
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[10pt, mono]
This is how it
https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2019/08/06/typesetting-markdown-part-7/
This installment tackles a cost-benefit analysis problem comparing
electric to gasoline-powered vehicles, calls into R for amortization,
typesets math and a repayment schedule, continues to explore the
separation of content
text from the pdf, e.g., \CATCA becomes 퓒nt.
OTOH, issues 4.i and 4.ii below are still perplexing. Are there any
workarounds?
Thanks again.
Best wishes
Idris
> Hamid,Idris schrieb am 03.05.2019 um 21:40:
>> Dear gang,
>>
>> Ok, I've made some progress:
>>
>> 1. tex-
Hi Idris,
please read this: https://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/#Superscripts
Wolfgang
Hamid,Idris schrieb am 03.05.2019 um 21:40:
Dear gang,
Ok, I've made some progress:
1. tex-gyre etc. *do* support Unicode mathematics, but the version of
ConTeXt I was using had produced the wrong encoding
Dear gang,
Ok, I've made some progress:
1. tex-gyre etc. *do* support Unicode mathematics, but the version of
ConTeXt I was using had produced the wrong encoding in the pdf output. For
example, U+1D4D2 (퓒) in the input was being mapped to U+2D4D2 in the
output.
Updating to the latest beta
Dear gang,
I need to convert a document from TeX-style to Unicode mathematics. For
example:
\starttext
\def\ANTI{{^{\rm nt}}}
\def\CATCA{$\cal \bf C\ANTI$}
\CATCA
\stoptext
Issues:
1. I need calligraphic characters, but the relevant characters in
latinmodern-math.otf are not encoded
On 2/25/2019 9:47 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Bump
i'll catch it (no uploads today)
On 19/02/19 10:02 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear Hans,
In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is
not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter
\everymathematics
Bump
On 19/02/19 10:02 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
> Dear Hans,
>
> In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is
> not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter
> \everymathematics manually it works fine. Is this by design or is this
> a bug? MWE
Dear Hans,
In the following example I want to locally set lcgreek=normal but it is
not picked up because the attribute is not propagated. When I enter
\everymathematics manually it works fine. Is this by design or is this
a bug? MWE below.
Cheers, Henri
---
\starttext
The greek letter
Mathias Schickel schrieb am 07.12.18 um 12:09:
Dear list,
it seems that \mframed does not align properly. Compare the example
fount at https://www.contextgarden.net/Framed#Location_parameter to
the compiled example attached.
What can I do to get a correctly aligned framed formula?
Dear list,it seems that \mframed does not align properly. Compare the example fount at https://www.contextgarden.net/Framed#Location_parameter to the compiled example attached.What can I do to get a correctly aligned framed formula?Many thanks for you help,Mathias
mframed.tex
Description: TeX
you try to achieve.
Wolfgang
Shuxian Wang schrieb am 14.10.18 um 04:16:
Hello list,
As a new user of ConTeXt, I have some trouble on trying out various
mathematics modules.
I tried to use the nath module by directly including
`\usemodule[nath]` in my source file. It seems that the module
Hello list,
As a new user of ConTeXt, I have some trouble on trying out various
mathematics modules.
I tried to use the nath module by directly including `\usemodule[nath]`
in my source file. It seems that the module is not loaded. I read
through the wiki page and found that nath
> On 9 Jul 2018, at 21:27, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> On 9 Jul 2018, at 17:48, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian wrote:
The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment
such as a
> On 9 Jul 2018, at 17:48, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>> The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment
>>> such as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted)
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian wrote:
The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment such as
a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the text in the
above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.
On 7/9/2018 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Alan,
you should at least limit the scope of the command to math mode
\appendtoks
\let\t\mathtext
\let\w\mathword
\to \everymathematics
something
\ifdefined\t \else \unexpanded\def\t{\mathortext\text\mathtext} \fi
\ifdefined\w \else
> On 8 Jul 2018, at 23:00, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
> The advantage being that if the above formula appears in an environment such
> as a Theorem (where the text is typeset in italic, or slanted) the text in
> the above \mbox will be also in italic or slanted.
Math displayed formula text
an abundant need
to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{}
or whatever is unwieldy.
Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be
text and not symbols. These situations can be very common. This is why I
asked (1) what is the right method, and (2
In many "less-rigorous" uses of equations, there is an abundant need
to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{}
or whatever is unwieldy.
Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be
text and not symbols. These situations can be v
ing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
>> or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
>> Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.
>>
>> We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
>> the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
>>
ve you crazy to see TeX users write $t = time$?
(I see this all of the time by LaTeX users in Beamer presentations.)
One can do better writing $t = {\rm time}$ (maybe)
or in ConTeXt $t = \mathrm{time}$.
Sometimes, too, I might write $t = \text{time}$.
We also have the commands \mathematics{} th
numeric_Symbols
> We also have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
> the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
>
> I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
> used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
>
have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky...
Alan
reur schrieb:
>
> > I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find
> that
> > it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for
> > writing
> > Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
> &
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb:
> I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
> it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for
> writing
> Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
> mathematical formul
d.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:27:40PM +0200, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> Hello,
> I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
> it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for writing
> Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for te
Hello,
I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for writing
Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
mathematical formulas. What do you recommend ?
Thank you.
Fabrice
On 12/3/2015 3:16 AM, Maggyero wrote:
In both LaTeX and ConTeXt, we have two kinds of fonts:
— a text font: multi-letter words;
— a math font: single letter words.
In math mode, using LaTeX, text fonts can use both
— text spacing: $\textit{abc ffi}$ gives abc ffi;
— math spacing: $\mathit{abc
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that Will
Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX package
(\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)? Because ConTeXt
currently has the same math/text spacing issues in math mode that the
On 11/30/2015 6:20 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that
Will Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX
package (\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)?
Because ConTeXt currently has the same
Hello ConTeXist.
0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or
it is a general problem of ConTeXt?
1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of
non-elementary mathematics?
2. Are you satisfied with the results, which produces ConTeXt (thinking
) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt).
It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax as
in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since it
does not make sense to have \| yield a single bar since | does)
That is the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax
as
in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since
Hi Mikael,
as in my first answer use:
f''_xx or f''_{xx} if you need both xs'
I have tried it at it looks very similar to your LaTeX example.
Start another thread about the single prime as bug. Since this one is marked as
OT
and others more more knowledgeable might not be reading this.
/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my collaborators
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using
:00 Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams
Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine
2014-02-11 10:18 GMT+01:00 Fabrice Couvreur fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com:
Unless I am mistaken, Cambria is a font available for Windows. I'm using
Linux, is it possible to install ? Is it free ? If yes, where can I download
it ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambria_(typeface)#Availability
) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt).
It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt
Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research
using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my
collaborators dont know ConTeXt).
It certainly works OK
a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I
am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths
represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some
mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across
borders of my knowledge
Hi,
I begin to migrate slowly to ConTeXt, and I think it works very well for
writing mathematics.
I have a question : what is the most complete Math Font to write mathematics
with ConteXt course ?
thank you,
Fabrice
2014-02-10 9:45 GMT+01:00 Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.de:
Hi Jaroslav
On 2/10/2014 10:08 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
Hi,
I begin to migrate slowly to ConTeXt, and I think it works very well for
writing mathematics.
I have a question : what is the most complete Math Font to write
mathematics with ConteXt course?
thank you,
cambria is the reference font
xits
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my
satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths
represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some
mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across
borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for
typesetting of mathematics.
I
Hi,
I do use ConTeXt for typesetting mathematics, and actually I began to use
ConTeXt several years ago for my work as a mathematician: up to now I haven’t
encountered a single instance in which ConTeXt would not give the expected
result, and as a matter of fact the out-of-the-box capabilities
for your advice and help.
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Dne 9.2.2014 23:31, Otared Kavian napsal(a):
Hi,
I do use ConTeXt for typesetting mathematics, and actually I began to use
ConTeXt several years ago for my work as a mathematician: up to now I haven’t
encountered a single instance in which
It maybe helpful for beginners if there were sample documents for
mathematical typesetting (for the current version of context) that could
be used as a start for their own projects.
Maybe list members can contribute some for addition to the documentation
wiki.
Is something gone funny with mathematics?
\starttext
$\lim_1^2$
$\int_1^2$
\stoptext
Undefined control sequence ...
1 \starttext
2 $\lim_1^2$
3
4 $\int_1^2$
5 \stoptext
6
recently read \lim_
l.2 $\lim_
1^2$
?
! Undefined control sequence.
1
On 2013–10–08 Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Is something gone funny with mathematics?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/84607/focus=84616
It was a bug which has been fixed in the current beta.
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 6/22/2013 10:45 PM, Sander Maijers wrote:
If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator
is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts
specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using
Inicode characters for such operators?
This
If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator
is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts
specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using
Inicode characters for such operators?
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we know that Sanjoy uses ConTeXt)
--
luigi
On Sun 22 May 2011, luigi scarso wrote:
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we know that Sanjoy uses ConTeXt)
Saw
2011/5/22 Pontus Lurcock p...@talvi.net:
http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/full_pdfs/Street-Fighting_Mathematics.pdf
- the /ArtBox is an inch too high
- for linearizing you can also use qpdf
Best
Martin
___
If your
On 22-5-2011 12:32, luigi scarso wrote:
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we know that Sanjoy uses ConTeXt)
Nice
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-5-2011 12:32, luigi scarso wrote:
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we
Hi.When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my math operators with \mathematics, e.g.\def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm running into problems in MPgraphics:
Texexec compiles the following file fine until I add
Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
Hi.
When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my
math operators with \mathematics, e.g.
\def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.
So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm
running into problems in MPgraphics:
Texexec
Cool, it works nicely here, too.Thanks,Boris.On 8/14/06, taco hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boris Tschirschwitz wrote: Hi. When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my
math operators with \mathematics, e.g. \def\grp{\mathematics{G}}. So far I was using this like I use
The following has to be added to nath for spacing to work correctly:
\def\mathematics#1{\relax\ifmmode#1\else$#1$\fi}
adding it anywhere after
\def$#1${\@@dollar{#1}}
seems to work fine. The problem is that $ is redefined, but
\mathematics doesn't catch on so the spacing gets all messed up
69 matches
Mail list logo
